Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading...
Pharmacists Integrate into Geriatric Emergency Department

Jul 22, 2015

EDITOR’S NOTE: The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recently approved a policy supporting clinical pharmacy services in emergency departments (EDs). ACEP’s policy notes that pharmacists serve a “critical role in ensuring efficient, safe, and effective medication use,” and calls on health systems to support dedicated roles for pharmacists in the ED that involve pharmacists as active participants in patient care decisions, including resuscitations, transitions of care, and medication reconciliation. Members of the ASHP Section of Clinical Specialists and Scientists’ advisory group on emergency medicine worked with the ACEP’s New York affiliate to introduce and champion a resolution that led to the formal policy statement. The below story originally appeared in ASHP InterSections on Jan. 19, 2015.

ACEP recently endorsed the valuable role of pharmacists in the ED, including an active role in  resuscitations, transitions of care, and medication reconciliation.

ACEP recently endorsed the valuable role of pharmacists in the ED, including an active role in resuscitations, transitions of care, and medication reconciliation.

 

WHEN UPSTATE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL in Syracuse, New York, began looking at adding a geriatric emergency department (ED) to Community Campus, the pharmacy department did not have to ask about participating, said director Beth Szymaniak.

“We were invited to be on the committee, and we were automatically assumed . . . to be a part of it,” Szymaniak said of the eight-bed geriatric ED, which opened in July 2013. “We just had to figure out how many FTEs [full-time equivalents] we wanted.”

The number of pharmacist FTEs in the geriatric ED is now 2, which was the pharmacy department’s original request, said the long-time director.

Pharmacist services should be an ancillary service of all geriatric EDs, according to a set of guidelines developed by two nonpharmacy organizations.

Approved in October 2012 by the American College of Emergency Physicians Geriatric Section and the Academy of Geriatric Emergency Medicine, the document “Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines” supports dual goals for an ED specializing in the care of people 65 years of age or older:

•    Recognize the patients who will benefit from inpatient care.
•    Efficiently provide outpatient care to those who do not require inpatient resources.

The guidelines recommend completion of a medication list for all patients 65 years of age or older arriving to the ED.

The guidelines do not recommend a specific professional for completing the medication list. But they do recommend a multidisciplinary approach to managing patients who are taking more than five medications, using any “high-risk” medication, or experiencing signs or symptoms of an adverse drug event.

Nikolas Onufrak, one of the two pharmacists in Upstate University Hospital at Community Campus’s geriatric ED, said the multidisciplinary team strives to prevent initial hospitalizations and also repeat visits due to lack of comprehensive care.

Kelly_BrahamSo far, said pharmacist Kelly R. Braham, the admission rate for patients from the geriatric ED, which operates 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily, has decreased to 35% from an initial 42%.

Braham and Onufrak said their primary responsibility as geriatric emergency medicine pharmacists is to analyze patients’ medication regimens.

However, getting to the point of being able to analyze the regimens, Onufrak noted, requires “a little detective work.”

That means a lot of phone calls to pharmacies and physician offices and conversations with patients and family members, he said.

“We do the best we can to figure out what they actually are taking and reconcile that with the reason why they’re presenting to us,” he said. Then attention turns to assessing the appropriateness of all the medication regimens and determining whether any relate to the ED visit.

Braham said she and Onufrak pay particular attention to the overall anticholinergic burden of patients’ medications and use two tools—the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria—to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people.

The two pharmacists also check for drug interactions before recommending interventions, she said.

And the pharmacists educate the patient as much as possible about every medication on the list and the drug’s purpose.

For a substantial percentage of the patients, said Onufrak, “there are significant [medication-related] interventions to be made at the point of care when they come into the ED.”

For a substantial percentage of the patients, there are significant [medication-related] interventions to be made at the point of care when they come into the ED.

Braham recounted one such case from just the previous week.

“He came in and he was taking both apixaban and rivaroxaban,” she said of the patient, who did not speak English.

“They were prescribed by two different providers; neither was his primary care doctor. However, he had been on this regimen since May.”

A computed tomography scan of the man’s head showed no sign of bleeding despite his taking the two anticoagulants for six months and recently falling down, Braham said.

“How he got by for that long I don’t know, but that’s something that we definitely rectified,” she said.

More common, Braham said, is the pharmacist’s recommendation to change a patient’s hypertension therapy to avoid a medication that causes orthostatic hypotension, which is a fall risk.

Onufrak said he and Braham typically see 20–30 patients over the course of a 10-hour workday. Not all of these patients are in the geriatric ED, however.

Nikolas_OnufrakAs time permits, the two pharmacists also see patients in the transitional care unit and general ED. Whether geriatric EDs lower costs remains uncertain, however.

An observational study at a community hospital in Ann Arbor, Michigan, found that after its geriatric ED opened in October 2010, patients 65 years of age or older had a lower risk of hospital admission than when that population was seen in the general ED.

But there were no differences in the risks of a repeat ED visit within 30 and 180 days. Neither was there a change in the average length of stay for those patients admitted to the hospital. The researchers reported that the pharmacists evaluated only selected patients in the geriatric ED.

A three-hospital study of geriatric EDs in Illinois, New Jersey, and New York is underway, funded with $12.7 million from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Innovation Center.

Known as Geriatric Emergency Department Innovations in care through Workforce, Informatics, and Structural Enhancements (or GEDI WISE), the study is projected to yield $40.1 million in cost savings.

These savings, the study investigators stated, will come from reductions in hospital admissions, readmissions within 30 days, ED visits, repeat ED visits, and days in the intensive care unit.

“Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines” is available from www.acep.org/geriEDguidelines.

 

 –By Cheryl A. Thompson, reprinted with permission from AJHP (Jan. 15, 2015; volume 72, pages 92, 94)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
(Visited 17176 times, 0 visits today)
Current Issue, Feature Stories

About the author

The author didnt add any Information to his profile yet